Tuesday, June 14, 2005

Michael Jackson innocent? asked one blogger

No, he is not innocent. He just was found NOT GUILTY of the crimes brought against him.

I believe, as one of the lawyers involved commented, he probably did molest some children at some point. Just there was a reasonable doubt that he was not guilty of perpetrating the crimes alleged against him by these particular "victims."

In other words, this woman, mother of the kid, and her family, colluded to get some money off of what they perceived was a real problem, i.e. Michael Jackson's weakness for young boys. In a weird way, they are to be both credited for bringing the problem to the public's attention, but also possibly blamed for trying to profit from a tragedy involving other children and this sick actor.


At Tuesday, June 14, 2005 8:59:00 AM, Blogger Chas said...

Can families keep coming forth and suing him for the same thing; I'm guessing they can, but do you think that if it happens again it'll keep getting the same level of interest from the public? I'd truly hate for a serious abuse case against him to not be taken seriously b/c he's already been found not guilty before.


Post a Comment

<< Home